Usability Via Information Architecture
April 21, 2004 |
7 Comments
I’ve come to find that a good way to gather data about your users is to involve them in your Information Architecture process. I realize that Information Architecture can seem a bit daunting to many Web designers and Web developers but at its most basic it’s something you probably practice on a day-to-day basis.
If you’ve ever created a site map, done card sorting exercises or been involved in a meeting with stakeholders about “navigation” and “labels”, you’ve been practicing IA. These kinds of exercises, and many more, are a necessary part of building Web sites and applications.
Unfortunately these exercises are often conducted in-house, with only the Web team and the various stakeholders involved. But what about the users?
If you take the time to involve your users from the beginning, you can not only help better lay the ground work for your site, but gather some useful user data in that process and provide a framework to help advocate for your users in the future.
I think it’s best to illustrate this with an example.
An IA Problem
I’ve been recently involved in some meetings with our Foundation and Guild (the folks who get people to donate) down at the hospital. Turns out they need to get a whole bunch of information up on the Web.
We had originally envisioned expanding upon our philanthropy section of the hospital’s main external Web site to accommodate this, but quickly realized that the shear size and scope of the information they wanted to publish was too large for our (otherwise fairly scaleable) IA to support.
They needed a separate Web site.
We started the process by setting goals for the site. This was followed by a content inventory and some card sorting exercises with the various (there are quite a few) stakeholders involved. It became apparent that the labels and structure they were coming up with were very organizationally focused — in the few spots they could even agree on it. Sounding familiar?
All of this is very typical and was to be expected. We had internal and organizational goals laid out for this site, but we lacked user involvement at this point. We’d also come to an impasse of sorts with our IA.
So, where do we go from here?
Enter The Users
It was decided that we should touch base with our audiences. To that end we arranged some card sorting and findability sessions with a few small groups of users that represent our target audiences. This allows us to:
- Connect with our users in a fun and interesting way
- Label our content in “user” terms, as opposed to “organizational” terms
- Help settle internal IA disputes
- Get away from the “org chart” IA
- Begin to gather some good user data
And, maybe most importantly:
- Provide a starting point to sell our stakeholders on usability and user-centered design
These kinds of IA exercises are fairly easy to set up and do, can be run by almost anyone who has an interest in learning how to do it and can provide some great information. They work as an excellent base to begin contact with your users and provide an excellent bridge between the user and the stakeholder.
In fact, many of you may have already been doing these kinds of things, like we were, with internal audiences. I still feel those sessions are valuable, but they become even more valuable when coupled with user sessions.
IA and usability go hand in hand, and in this case, you can use one to help facilitate the other.
For more on “entry level” IA techniques see the following:
Filed under: IA and Usability
Comments
1. Horacio Salazar said:
A nice way of reminding us that we need to be strong not only in the AI skills, but also (and maybe mainly) in the people skills needed to be more than just adequate: to be needed.
Posted on April 21, 2004 01:45 PM | #
2. DarkBlue said:
Without a doubt, one of the most useful, real-world articles I’ve read in a while.
“Provide a starting point to sell our stakeholders on usability and user-centered design”
This single point is the highlight of the article for me. I have tried in the past to get clients to bow towards standards compliancy and usability and, almost always, my efforts are for nowt because they want a Flash-based “multimedia experience”.
Pulling real users into the equation could make a world of difference.
Posted on April 21, 2004 01:51 PM | #
3. Steven Streight said:
Great article. I just finished a User Observation Test for the web site of a local Boy Scout Council. I did the live usability tests with representative users striving to perform task assignments at the site on computers as I took notes (Home > Programs > Training > …) and my wife timed them with a stopwatch.
But I also had the test subjects fill out a Link Strategy Survey (like card sorting, but asked what they expect to find at various links, and what other topics should be links on home page), Site Satisfaction Survey, Computer Skills Level Survey, and a modified SUS (System Usability Scale) Questionnaire (see usabilitynet.org).
Repeat after me: “Web sites are for users, to meet users’ needs, in user language, for maximum user satisfaction. Web sites are not for designers or corporations. Web sites are for users.”
I like this web site. Nice design. Actually, very gorgeous, as the CSS fanatics say.
One minor point: why do blogs have archive listed by month and year? I never think, “Wow. I wonder what January 2002 is like!!!” Is there some better way to organize blog archives? Will you be the pioneer in this? Do I secretly have the answer? hmmmmmm………
I shall return…I like this site so far….
Posted on April 21, 2004 08:52 PM | #
4. Donna Maurer said:
Good stuff and thanks for the link to our card sorting article ;)
I’ve not used the term ‘findability sessions’ before & wonder if you have some cool techniques to share…
Posted on April 21, 2004 11:49 PM | #
5. Andy Budd said:
Hi Keith,
You continually amaze me with the quality and scope of your articles. Have you ever thought of writing a book? I for one would buy it!
Posted on April 22, 2004 03:13 AM | #
6. Keith said:
Wow, thanks Andy. I’ve not really thought of writing a book, but it would be fun. I think I’ve got a ways to go before my writing is good enough, but maybe some day!
Donna – Findability sessions are pretty much just concentrated user tests where they go through wireframes (or a Web site, or ???) using a script trying to find things.
Then their asked questions about content areas like, “Where would you look for X?”
Maybe I can write something up on the process…
Posted on April 22, 2004 10:02 AM | #
7. Elaine said:
we’ve been going through this “assessment project” (special funding from the college for assessing various activities), and as part of it have done a bunch of card sorts with students. luckily we have a librarian on our team who does something similar in her research methods class every year, so I can just sit back & take notes. :)
from my POV, one of the better results has been having various team members and other staff sit in on the sessions as the students move the cards (with our current topics) into groups. people definitely have aha! moments watching these – me included.
today we’re going to try the same exercise in my department staff meeting: I’m very curious to see how our thinking matches and diverges from the results we’ve gotten from students.
Posted on April 28, 2004 09:43 AM | #
Comments are now closed