Designing The Band: Chapter Three
June 24, 2004 |
20 Comments
Welcome to Chapter Three of the Designing The Band project. If you’ve missed anything, feel free to catch up.
In the previous weeks we’ve done quite a bit of preparation and brainstorming and we’re finally getting into the phase where we get some actual work done and get into the design process.
Last week we set some goals, met a few of our users (and some of our competition), devised a rough plan and set the groundwork for a successful, user-centered Web design built on solid Web best practices.
Since then I’ve been a busy bee — on two fronts. On the organizational and content end I’ve come up with a simple information architecture, and on the design end, I’ve been hard at work coming up with simple layouts and the beginning of some visual elements.
Information Architecture
To be quite honest, the Beauideal Web site should be pretty simple. Rather than go through a full blown IA process, what I did was take what we know about out users and what we’ve laid out from our goals and break them down into what I like to call a “content inventory.”
This inventory is simply a list of content, areas and features for the site. I then grouped these into pages and gave those pages simple labels. These labels are based on what seemed to work for other sites of a similar nature and frankly, a little bit of common sense.
For example, I call the page with all the tour information — “Tour”.
Pretty easy right? Well, you’d be surprised how often these labels don’t make sense on sites out there. As well, at some point I plan to test these labels with users, so they’re not set in stone yet.
In any case, what we have now is a simple listing of content grouped into pages as follows:
- Home: Short Introductory Bio, News Blog, Tour Dates, Newsletter Signup, mp3 player, Album Feature (with direct link to store)
- About: History, Expanded Bios
- Tour: Expanded Tour Information, Tour Diary
- Press: Reviews, Press Releases, Media Contact Info, Secure Media Section (thanks Jaxon)
- Extras: Photos, Lyrics, Videos, Goodies
- Message Board (hosted)
- Store ( would probably go with 3rd party hosted solution)
- Contact: Management Contact Form, Fan Contact Form
I’m not going to bother with a site map or findability testing for this project. It’s just not that complicated and doesn’t warrant that level of effort.
As well, I’m going to dispense with the traditional pre-design wireframes and roll that up into the design process. You’ll see what I mean when I get to talking about mockups.
Visual Feel
Before I get into working with actual mock-ups I want to gather together some materials for the visual design. Some may think this is a bit backwards, but I really wanted to try and create a feel for the band (and for the forthcoming site) before I got into the layout and such.
The first thing I did was sit down with a piece of paper and write down some adjectives that I wanted to associate with the band and the design. The purpose of this is to give me a baseline for thinking about the visual elements and the identity. This is a great brainstorming exercise to use in a group as well.
Here are the adjectives I came up with: Different | Inner Light | Simple | Whimsical | Classic | Timeless | Hip | Active | Real? | Fantasy? | Not Forced | Light and Dark | Hot and Cold | Textured.
Then, keeping this developing “feel” in mind as well as the feel of all the other sites I looked at while doing my competitive analysis, I tried to focus on things that would help differentiate this site from the rest.
I flipped through magazines, browsed Web sites, looked through photos and noted other things around me that seemed to fit into this “feel” I was holding in my mind.
(Magazines are especially good for this as you can tear out elements you like and get your creative juices flowing. One thing I like to do is try to construct a page mock-up with only elements torn from magazines. But that is for another post!)
It’s hard to describe in words what I came up with, but I now have a visual feel for the design in my head that is both young and old, light and dark and fun and serious. It’s almost a personality.
At this point I began to gather my own materials that reflected this personality or “feel” for use later on. I got onto iStockphoto and downloaded quite a few photos, I took a few of my own and now I’ve got some material to work with.
Type
Next I wanted to come up with a type treatment for the Beauideal “logo” as well type for the Web site.
I began with the logo treatment. I started by creating a document in Illustrator and trying out various fonts and treatments. I got this idea from Doug Bowman and it seems to be a good place to start.
I also try to take notice of typography around me. I look at CD covers, magazines, books and much more trying to find something that will fit. Sometimes this works, sometimes it doesn’t. In this case it did.
I found a look that fit my needs here on a book cover. Les Miserables to be exact. I liked the treatment on the title, it was taken from the identity developed for the musical. It is classic, solid yet somewhat worn.
I’m not sure what the exact font they used was, and it’s not exactly what I was looking for, but going back to my Illustrator document I decided that Adobe Garamond, which is a somewhat similar font that I’m very fond of anyway, would do nicely.
I gave it a treatment very similar to Cameron’s Wicked Worn Look, to create something similar to the Les Mis title, yet a bit different.
Here is what I came up with:

Then I began to think a bit about the type faces I’d use for the Web site itself. I’ll nail this down a bit later when I get into the HTML prototype, but for now I’ve got a general idea.
For the body of the Web content I plan on using Verdana. I’m a big fan and simply find it the most readable font on the Web. Maybe it’s overused, but for body copy it can’t be beat.
When it comes to headings and navigation, I decided I need to do a bit more experimentation, preferably with the actual Web product before I can make a decision. It’s a bit hard to recreated the feel in photoshop and I may try and use images here anyway. But more on that later, when we get into mockups.
Color
Let’s touch on color a bit now. I tried to think of quite a few color schemes that fit into this general feel I was developing. I thought about going mono-tone with a deep blue or deep auburn, but decided that it would be best to go with a series of dark colors (whatever they may be) set off with something light, like a white or cream.
While looking through my materials I came across a photo I took a few weeks back of a cloudy evening sky. Here is a snip:

This photo, when imagined with a strip of bight cream or white moonlight splashed across it, seemed to work well and fit with what I was thinking. I then saw a similar color scheme in an ad in Rolling Stone (it was for the movie The Butterfly Effect) that used red as the contrast. I liked that as well and came up with a few swatches to play with.
Here is a sample of what I’ve got so far:

I also decided I may try to work the photo into the design as well, use those clouds to create a textured feel. But I may change my mind.
Layout and Design
Now that I had some good ideas, some materials, some colors and a general idea of the type treatments I wanted to use it was time to start thinking about the layout of my site.
I’m a really, really big fan of paper prototyping and hand sketching. I probably do much more of this than some other Web designers. It’s just how I like to work. Some like to do mock-ups in Illustrator, Photoshop and even Flash, and I know this can be a fine way to work. Me? I like to start on paper.
I began by sketching out some very rough layouts, just to get my mind working. You can see an example here:
I did about three pages of that, then moved to a few, larger, more detailed sketches, like this:
Once I settled on a few layouts I liked I moved into Photoshop for a bit. Here I like to mock up separate elements and move them around to see how they all fit. I created six very rough Photoshop mockups and sat on them for a day or two, then I whittled them down to a few I liked more than the rest.
With those I began to add some more detail and flesh them out a bit. I plan to narrow these down to one solid design to move forward with. If I was working with a real client I’d probably get pretty far with three designs and show those to the client to get a feel for what they like.
Usually when I do this I’ve got one design in mind that I like the best and I use the others to help sell my chosen favorite. But it really depends on the project and the client. In any case I like to give them choices.
For the purposes of this project, I’m not going to bother to get too far on more than one. I’ll just work until I’ve got one that I like a lot, then take that one and go forward with it.
As of right now, and I’m still working on them, I’ve got two to show y’all:
The final will most likely be some combination between, or variation of the two. As you can see by looking at them they have some common elements, but there are still many details to be worked out.
Next Steps: Final Mockup, Final Color, Type and Image Study, and HTML prototypes
We’ve made significant progress on the design, but we have quite a few details to work out. And you know what they say about the details right?
The Devil’s in there!
I also need to begin to build out the HTML prototype, even if we’ve got design details yet to nail down, so that I can get something out there for user testing. Yes, I do plan on doing some for this site, and it should prove very enlightening.
So, any comments or ideas on what we’ve got so far? If you have any questions or something to say about the visual elements, type or design I’ve worked up so far, now’d be the time to pipe up.
Also, I realize these write-ups are getting rather long. There is just so much to say! However, feel free to comment on them as well. Let me know if there is an area I’m not covering or if you’d like to know more about something and I’ll be more than happy to address that in the comments.
See y’all next week!
Filed under: Design Project


Comments
1. Brian Rose said:
I’m really enjoying the project so far and am gaining quite a bit of insight. It’s nice to see someone else who does their initial mockups on paper. I’ve had a few colleagues give me a little flack for it, saying my approach was dated.
I particularly like the second mockup you did - it’s very clean and looks like someone put a lot more effort into it than most other band websites. The first gives me the impression that the nav is too separated from the other two boxes - that may just be me.
Thanks for doing this project, especially for offering the ameteur web designers out there a look at how your design process works.
Posted on June 24, 2004 04:41 PM | #
2. dotsara said:
I really like the way you drop-capped the “B” for the mockups; it’s visually more interesting than having the same baseline for the whole word. I was going to suggest a little bit of kerning, but you’ve already gotten to that on the mockups. The “wearing” you applied to the letters is lovely; anything crisper would have been too.. well, crisp.
Of the two mockups, I like the vibe on mock2 the best. The lightlight gray seems… cleaner and yet, moodier at the same time.
I think this is moving along swimmingly. (:
Posted on June 24, 2004 04:43 PM | #
3. Carl-Johan Kihlbom said:
I unfortunately haven’t got anything useful to say about the project itself just now. I will however say this regarding the write-ups – I love them! The post are very informative without being dry, and very entertaining without being to wordy. Thus the length really isn’t a problem.
I’m really looking forward to seeing what everyone has to say!
Posted on June 24, 2004 04:56 PM | #
4. Tom Werner said:
I really like the first mockup. Why? It feels more organic and natural. Like how I expect Beauideal’s music to sound. The second design seems too slick, too technologicalesque with the metallic looking nav strip. Brian is right about the nav getting a little lost though, perhaps giving it a little more breathing room would emphasize it. I also love the inverse rounded corners, reminding me of old fashioned movie tickets. The worn side-lines are also a very nice touch, further establishing the mood of mockup 1.
This may be premature, but have you considered using WAC-FR (shameless plug) or IFR for log entry titles? It would be fantastic to use Adobe Garamond for that.
Kudos on this project, it’s always great to see others’ design processes.
Posted on June 24, 2004 05:31 PM | #
5. Jonathan Holst said:
This project is getting realy exciting :-).
By the mockups, I’m so much in for the first one. Especially the font used in the menu gives it the “gothish” look. This is also supported by the way the corners are cut out.
Even thought Brian says other things, I don’t think such pages should be clean. A little roughness is a good way to show that sort of music. IMHO.
And then I just love Verdana 10px.
Posted on June 24, 2004 05:37 PM | #
6. david g said:
I’ll add another vote for the first layout. The second is a bit generic, and the navbar on that one is a bit too trendy and incongruous with the rest of the design. The nav area on the first one could do with a bit more something, whitespace perhaps? I definitely prefer the content area in the first mockup, with the large title and good amount of breathing room. The horizontal rules on the second one are a bit overkill.
Posted on June 24, 2004 08:03 PM | #
7. Daniel Von Fange said:
As for your articles - they are fascinating. The length is just right. I’m more of a programmer than a designer, so the opportunity here to look over your shoulder in the design world is exciting.
I’m much in favor of the first mockup. I would hazard a guess that you like it too. The second looks like a well deigned tech blog.
Again, thanks for spending your time writing this process up.
Posted on June 24, 2004 08:40 PM | #
8. Kevin said:
Thanks for sharing the process that you use, these ‘Designing The Band’ articles are really informative and inspiring to all web designers and non-web designers.
Paper dated? Sheesh! You can bring it anywhere, no electricity, simple function, can store data and present graphics! :D All the designer needs!
I’d go for the 1st presented mockup. The feel is there for a goth band and incorporating white into a gothic theme is a welcome change from what I’ve seen around the web! And I do agree that the navigation of the first got squished in by the header and content elements of the layout… you’d probably enclose the nav with the same (or variation of the) background as the header.
Can’t wait for next week!
Posted on June 24, 2004 08:52 PM | #
9. Keith said:
Thanks for all the feedback. I’m not going to tell you which of the mockups is my “alpha” – I’d hate to give anything away, but I will say I do like elements of both even though I kind of prefer one of them to the other.
Also, these are very early mocks. We’re talking late last night and about two hours in. I’ve not been able to really capture many of the details I see in my head. Those take awhile at times.
Your comments are very helpful. That’s what I call Design Direction for Web Design in action!
Posted on June 24, 2004 09:05 PM | #
10. Tim Hill said:
This is probably really trivial, but is Dragonfly the name of the album, would you have in the title of the site? Isn’t the band name just Beauideal?
For the header graphic maybe an outline in the background of a dragonfly? but in the yellow (and really faded)
Or have the end of the beauideal trail off to form the dragonfly…
with the second one, i don’t think the nav fits with the chosen font,
the corners for the first design are awesome, how were you planning to implement that?
Posted on June 24, 2004 09:09 PM | #
11. Kevin Tamura said:
Oh boy I feel like a kid at Christmas. I kept checking back every couple hours to see if you had posted the next chapter.
Okay as to the project – I too am liking the direction of #1. The worn edges are nice element and aren’t overly used. Though I think they could be used a little more before crossing that line. #2 is okay but just doesn’t strike me.
Good progress Keith. The only down side is having to wait another seven days for the next chapter.
Posted on June 24, 2004 10:08 PM | #
12. Jason Marble said:
The two mock-ups are nice. The second is looking a little too tech-blogy. The cut corners on the first is a little interesting. The one thing I like the most about the first is the rough feel it gives. I would maybe consider a background color outside the bordering lines to give a little more definition. The nav is a little plain. So maybe you could use some texture to fill in some of the whitespace in the nav area and along the inside of the bordering lines. A little texture should add to the rough feel it kinda has as well as define the nav a little more.
As always, thanks Keith, and I can’t wait for the next chapter.
Posted on June 24, 2004 11:35 PM | #
13. Heath said:
I am on the bandwagon for the first mock-up as well. I think it fits much better with the Goth and such aspect of the band.
Also, I was thinking, even though it might not serve your purposes here it would be nice if you allowed the readers to do those non-essential things such as findability, because some of us have never seen how it is done. It doesn’t need to be formal, but more like a ‘if you feel like it’. I think most of us would enjoy that.
Regarding the length, I think everyone seems pretty happy to read whatever you write. There is a lot that goes into design and each person will like a different aspect, so keep it up (longer is fine by me).
Finally, remember accessibility. Make sure to make links look like links, etc, maybe it is too early for this, but it is important.
Posted on June 25, 2004 12:55 AM | #
14. Ian Gordon said:
Looks very interesting. I like the progression you are making, you are taking it nice and slow, not such that it will take forever, but you are making sure you cover all the details, the devil is in the details.
Personally, I like the second design more than the first, I feel the images flow better and the overall design has a more complete feel to it. On a side note, I don’t really like either of the designs, I know they are very early mock-up but, they still need to be checked, double checked and then triple checked. The design initially is good but, you have your work cut our for you.
Your method of doing the design on paper is good, it allows you alot more freedom then using a mouse and trying to create something like that or even using block elements. I am very interested to see what the final result it, how overall the layout flows and if the “band” likes the final result.
NOTE: When designing this, take into consideration, as someone mentioned earlier, accessibility, usability and over user experience, these three things can make or break a site.
Posted on June 25, 2004 06:28 AM | #
15. Jeremy said:
I’m piping up for the 1st mockup as well—when I think goth, I think high-contrast, flowing lines offset complemented by angular details, and glorifying the antiquated. So the subtle worn borders and the punched-out corners of mock-up #1 really play into that concept for me. Sure, they’re relatively simple elements, but really convey more of the goth feel.
Mock-up #2, on the other hand, has a more tech feel (especially the nav bar). If you were trying to sell this as a minimalist techno act (say, The Notwist), then that might work for me. Perhaps if the image and new lp images were carried over to the 2nd mock-up, that might offset that impression somewhat.
Posted on June 25, 2004 07:31 AM | #
16. jason stanfill said:
Keith, Thanks a lot for doing this, it is really great for someone new to the industry to see the process you use.
PS. I like both mockups very much, but the first seems better suited to the band. Just my thoughts.
Posted on June 25, 2004 07:44 AM | #
17. Jennifer Grucza said:
Wow, that first mock-up is beautiful. I’d love to hear more about how you came up with it - it seems like a huge leap between the paper sketches and the beautiful design of the mock-up. How do you do it? Was the picture of the girl from a stock photography site? Did you add the blurriness?
Posted on June 25, 2004 10:33 AM | #
18. Ollila said:
Keith, Thank you for sharing your design process with all of us. It is always great to see how others work.
Yes, I start with paper also. It’s the fastest, easiest and best way – in my opinion.
I see a lot of similarities between your initial sketch and mock1. I have a feeling this will be the mockup that comes out on top. And yeah, I vote for mock1 also. It just fits so much better than #2.
Posted on June 25, 2004 12:17 PM | #
19. [m] said:
I’m so loving this.
I like mockup 2 more, because it radiates more proffesionality (is that a word?), perticulately the top part. The cutout edges of the first might be more appropriate for the style of the band, but it also makes the design more amateuristic. I think it’s the depth “faked” in the second design, wich gives it the second mock a bit more appeal.
The text part is a bit out of style, with both of mocks. The font used is … plain. Doesn’t suit the design, but maybe that’s because I’ve seen it too much.
I’m looking forward to the next post!
Posted on June 25, 2004 01:48 PM | #
20. alana said:
Ok, I have been reading a lot over here, though not commenting much, as I’ve been rethinking parts of my own site. I have a few pages of preliminary sketches and themes (being a drawing person myself), and it was very relieving to see your sketches. It’s just the kind of thing, for me, that is a reinforcement for my own “good thought process.” (This means my attempt at being a little more organized and a little less spontaneous) Now, it would be nice not to need that reinforcement, but regardless, it’s nice to have.
Posted on June 25, 2004 10:58 PM | #
Comments are now closed