Hey y'all. Come visit me at dkeithrobinson.com
May 16, 2005 |
8 Comments
I’ve written about, and we’ve talked about, the difficulties in dealing with content for the Web. I think many of you agree with me that content is probably the hardest part of getting any kind of Web site up and running and that it’s made especially so when it comes to working with content outside of your own control.
I know that over the years this has been the single largest source of headaches for me when dealing with clients and internal stakeholders. Even at Boeing, where I had dedicated writer and editors, the content issue would present itself as an almost daily problem.
At my current gig it seems that getting the content we need is the single biggest barrier to making sure our sites are as good as can be. I’ve been trying very hard, to varying degrees of success, to find ways to make our experience with clients and content easier.
One that shows great promise is the use of a content brief.
I’ve borne witness to quite a few Web design and development methodologies and up until a few months ago, I’d never seen one that formally addressed content. The first I ever saw was over at gotomedia and even though they do talk quite a bit about content, and Kelly’s book has some great tips relating to content, they didn’t seem to address content in a formal manner.
I kept thinking to myself, “we spend so much time on the technical and design aspects of our projects. We walk the stakeholders all the way through that stuff, but we don’t spend near enough time on content. Then we act surprised when they don’t get it.”
This is something I’d just never really thought about until recently. Then again, I’ve never been in a position to really take control of a process and change it up before.
Now at PBDH they had a pretty solid process in place that addressed the content adequately, or as good as I’d seen. The problem is, it wasn’t (and honestly still probably isn’t) enough. So I did some brainstorming and came up with something I think may help.
Just about every process I’ve worked with has had a Creative Brief that helps inform the design and creative process. This document usually is where you’ll find any information relating to the content for a Web site.
I’m thinking that content is important enough, and problematic enough, to warrant it’s own brief.
What I’ve done is taken the creative brief and simply separated the content stuff. This allows not only for more focus on the content, but opens a new opportunity to help discuss the content and hopefully impress its importance to stakeholders.
The format of the brief can be whatever works best and it should be adjusted to suit your stakeholders, much like you’d do with a creative or technical brief. I’ve only used this a few times and I’m still working to try and get what I feel works best. For those who are like me, and just like to see an example, I’ve included one here: Content Brief Example (PDF).
In general what the content brief will do is:
It’s important to keep in mind that this document should work in concert with your other briefs and other informing documents. I refer to our personas and wireframes, etc. quite frequently in the content brief.
Again, this has been only marginally tested and while it seems to be working pretty well, and in theory should help quite a bit, I’m still seeing some of the same old problems I saw before I tried this out. Having said that, I feel that it’s worthwhile and will continue to use a content brief for my projects. If nothing else it helps open, and keep open, a running dialogue with clients and stakeholders about the importance of content.
In other-words, what it doesn’t make up for in time, it should make up for in quality and peace-of-mind. I’d love to hear what y’all thought and any ideas, question or suggestion would be great also.
Filed under: Content
Keyword Tags: content+brief content web design web content process
This sounds like what I’d expect a project manager to do. It IS like pulling teeth getting content from a client, but I think having someone nag them for it is sometimes the best you can do. I can’t think of many clients who’d do more than look over such a document then forget it.
Maybe there’s a better, tried-and-true method that we can learn from the publishing industry. Book and magazine editors have to get content from people all the time.
Are there any lessons you may have learned from writing your book which could apply?
Posted on May 16, 2005 03:50 PM | #
Stating in your contract that they will be billed at a certain point regardless of if content not supplied usually gathers wits.
Posted on May 16, 2005 05:34 PM | #
Good article! I’ve come to the decision that content should be fairly well sorted before design is really considered in depth.
Posted on May 17, 2005 01:25 AM | #
Well said: “This allows not only for more focus on the content […]” - I absolutely agree to (almost) everything you said, one cannot emphasize the importance of content all too often, and tragically, many people forget about this. Content and, generally, information is what actually pushes the web.
Posted on May 17, 2005 01:49 AM | #
Good article! I think we must sometimes be a little hard and say if you don’t have content you really don’t have a site worth the time, energy and money :)it takes to create it.
Posted on May 17, 2005 04:19 AM | #
I’m not sure I’d get into the realms of content blackmail / ‘provide content or die’ mentality.
Publishing does provide the odd lesson in chasing content, but it’s a little different. Journalists are often in the fortunate position where they’re deluged by content. They have too much. It’s their role to sort through that mass of content and present what’s relevant for the publication’s readers. Hacks are very rarely faced with this issue, given that a) a company will pull out all the stops to get details of their new service / product into the public domain and b) they often have the added resource of a PR agency to chase the client in parallel (for pro-active feature articles at least).
One thing you learn as a journalist is to pick up the phone and talk to people - constantly. Given that a client will become seriously annoyed after the third call in an hour, this isn’t really an option.
Go figure.
Posted on May 17, 2005 08:21 AM | #
We’ve used something similar, what we call a content requirements doc, and have since ported it into an excel spreadsheet so that they can fill out the content in it and we can then easily upload it into the database that will serve their content…
Posted on July 7, 2005 08:01 AM | #
is a writer, designer, etc. in Seattle, Washington.
Home | Search | Archives | Subscribe
What was the inspiration behind the domain name 7nights.com?
Kano Analysis and Customer Needs
Practical Search Engine Optimization
The highly recommended Dreamhost!